Log in

arbitration / adr news

Civil society seeks reforms to stem trade suits loses

By JULIUS BARIGABA

7 December 2019


Africa is getting the short end of the stick when it comes to bilateral investment treaties, losing millions of dollars from legal suits by multinationals.

Civil society groups under the banner of the Southern and Eastern Africa Trade Information and Negotiations Institute (Seatini) are now calling on governments to reform their investor state dispute settlement because “it is being unfairly used by investors to sue states for millions of dollars.”

The Seatini activists were in Arusha on December 2, to lobby the Committee on Communication, Trade and Investment of the East African Legislative Assembly on trade matters skewed against African countries.

Expert estimates since 1993 say Africa’s loss from legal claims by investors is $55.5 billion, and that this figure could double as these were limited to the amounts claimed by investors in only 54.7 per cent of the cases.

The civil society groups cited are the bilateral investment treaties; investor state dispute settlement, public private partnerships and lack of legally binding instruments on business and human rights.

Tied to the ISDS is the bilateral investments treaty, which the activists also want the East African Legislative Assembly to review and realign to the EAC Model Investment Treaty and the United Nationals Guiding principles, as approved in February 2016 by the EAC Sectoral Council on Trade, Industry and Investment to guide partner states in negotiating investment treaties with third parties.

“We going to try and follow up and engage EALA MPs more because some of them told us they don’t have as much power as civil society. They expects us to contribute more and lead the reforms,” said Faith Lumonya, an official with Seatini.

The investor state dispute settlement which has a provision that allows foreign investors to sue the host for millions of dollars, is not just an issue for EAC member states but a continent-wide problem.

Seatini raised the issue of Tanzania. In a document seen by The EastAfrican, legal suits against Tanzania have been brought on by efforts by the government to undertake reforms in its mining sector with a view to increasing the government’s stake and profitable returns for the country from its natural resources.

“Among the EAC partner states, the United Republic of Tanzania has remained the most targeted, owing to its large mining sector in which 28 per cent of the country’s foreign direct investment goes to this sector,” the document says.

Other reasons are related to regulatory efforts by the Tanzanian government in environment pollution and human rights abuse, the document says, adding that Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and Kenya have also faced legal suits by foreign investors in this regard.

Source: The East African








African Arbitration Association, P.O. Box 695, Nyarutarama, KG 9 Av. No. 66, Kigali, Rwanda

Privacy Policy  | Directory Terms of Use© 2018 African Arbitration Association


DISCLAIMER: No responsibility for loss occasioned to any person acting or refraining from action in reliance on or as a result of the information in or omitted from this website can be or is accepted by the AfAA, its officers, board members, employees or any other persons affiliated with the AfAA.